Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
for example, the "innovation" you grovel at the feet of innovated the american-based manufacturing base out of the united states. that "innovation" benefitted shareholders. in conservative-land, that is ethical. in the actual world, it is an act of class warfare.i do not think class war an effective way to address unemployment. apparently you do.
|
Shareholders put their money at risk investing in something there may or may not be a market for. If their venture fails, it is the shareholders who lose, not the employees. If their venture succeeds then they get the rewards. The employees hire on for a mutually agreeable salary and benefits. If the employees are dissatisfied, they can go elsewhere. If they want to take the risk, they can also innovate and hopefully succeed. This is the way it should be and was for quite a few years. This is not socialist Europe or communist Cuba.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
dogzilla---so you know, the position i am arguing from is not merely the opposite of yours.
i don't think taxes are the central problem.
|
So what is the problem? From my point of view the government is taking way too much money that rightfully belongs to those that earned it. Secondly the government is reaching into way to many aspects of life in this country. Cut the taxes to force the government to cut spending. That leaves the feds unable to meddle in quite so much.