That's the unfortunate thing Wes: a preponderance of evidence means that they don't need to prove it was him beyond a reasonable doubt, they just need to prove that the evidence shows it is more likely true than not. A police officer's testimony and no other evidence to point to makes it pretty likely they would rule against him.
I'm no lawyer though, so I reserve the right to be entirely wrong.
__________________
Le temps détruit tout
"Musicians are the carriers and communicators of spirit in the most immediate sense." - Kurt Elling
|