FuglyStick

You are looking for a witch to burn, rb, as you are doing in your Gulf spill thread, and that witch is main stream media and the government's "propaganda machine." As much as you like to trumpet your "objectivity," THAT is your true objective, and it is purely subjective. You are willing to whitewash any reason that correspondence is designated "classified" to support your position, even though, as hard as it may be for you to believe, you are not qualified to come to any conclusion. You will arrive at point "C" from point "A" by circumventing point "B;" what you lack in context or understanding of the truth of the situation you will fill with articles from other unqualified people, as long as they support your hypothesis and run counter to the "official" stance, which is the real target of your inquisition. In your mind, the "official" position MUST be wrong, based on your belief that anything "official" MUST be a ploy to manipulate the public; you will embrace any "unofficial" account with open arms, though, for no reason other than it is counter to the "official" account.

Frankly, this thread belongs in Tilted Paranoia, and not Tilted Politics, as it's currency is speculation, not information. The documentation may be authentic, but the "conclusions" drawn from said documentation without proper context or understanding of the instances at hand will be about as valid as a fundamentalist's interpretation of scripture.

And with that, I bow out of this thread. Reply if you wish, or not; I won't be returning.

__________________
AZIZ! LIGHT!