Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
|
Why are you putting this here. If I were arguing against the construction, and made my claims I could understand.
The point I am making isn't what WILL be there, it's the prejudices being used NOW to put forth an agenda and to take focus of the truly more serious issues this country needs to focus on.
Quote:
There are already at least three churches in the same area (just as close or closer than the proposed site), so the idea would be kind of silly.
|
And so that property should not be turned into another one just because there are so many there already? Even though Christianity itself has at least 10 different denominations recognized by the government... Baptist, Methodist, Episcopalian, Catholicism, Lutheran, Seventh Day Adventist, Jehovah's Witness, Presbyterian, Calvinist, Greek Orthodox... and then there are the many divisions of each of those groups, each wanting their own church.
So saying there are "at least three" putting more there would be kind of silly... is kind of like saying... "all you denominations that don't have one of those 3 churches... aw fucking well, there's enough of your Christian kind represented here."
Sounds kind of ignorant put that way, but isn't that pretty much what you said?