I don't see how, except that the NAACP is a centralised group with a leadership structure of which demands may reasonably be made, while the Tea Party is not. You appear to base your contention of false equivalency upon longevity and your political prejudices (Left = good, legitimate, coherent; Right = bad, illegitimate, incoherent). I base my contention of equivalency on the fact that both groups are composed of individuals with a widely varying field of viewpoints, that some of those individuals and viewpoints are racist and repugnant while the majority are not, and that both groups are advocating to whatever extent they are able for their own interests as they see them.
|