|
Why is Michael Steele defending the tea party movement? He's the guy from the establishment who heads a party that has completely and repeatedly sold out tea party values whenever he was given the chance.
I suspect the conflict would be best described as a conflict about racism between two people with different definitions of racism. So it's really nothing more than a giant semantic cluster fuck.
And can we stop with the preemptive "I guess that makes me a racist" bullshit? Geez Pan, have you stopped even waiting for people to respond to your posts before you play the victim card?
|