Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
What is the underlying concept in play here?
First:
A person or persons want to take an action based on their beliefs that they think will influence events.
Another person or persons respond to actions, in a manner not to the liking of the person or persons above - and they get offended.
Actions have consequences. Occasionally the consequences are not what was expected, if true, can you live with those consequences - otherwise don't take the action.
|
Except that the "consequence" comes in form of a criminal law. So voicing support to a voluntary boycott becomes a crime, which is a complete imbalance.