View Single Post
Old 07-05-2010, 12:28 PM   #8 (permalink)
oliver9184
Psycho
 
Jetée: some of those suggestions were semi-serious but most of them were downright stupid or something as far as possible from what I suppose that director would want to watch. Not too much thought went into it I'm afraid!

A few years ago when I was studying film, having just found out about auteur theory, I would place much more importance on a film's director than I do now. I would try to follow a director's career in order, indiscriminately watching good and bad. I follow particular stars/actors far more these days. I will sit through a film I know will be bad for the sake of watching a particular star but the same couldn't be said for a particular director, anymore.

You can make a great film without a great director; to make one without either great acting or great writing (or both) is, I think, rare to the point of anomaly. Everyone notices and comments on bad acting and writing; when did you last see a bad bit of directing? If there is such a thing, surely nobody except a film director or maybe a cynical critic with an agenda to pursue would notice. Bad directing to Joe Schmoe would be if you didn't see what you were supposed to see, which NEVER happens. The work of the writer(s) and actors is solid and tangible whereas the work of the director is (not always but often) vague and abstract. Part of the director's job, I think, especially these days, is to be seen - on both sides of the camera - to be spinning magic and making things happen almost by sheer force of will. A lot of it's flim-flam. How many films are sold as coming "from visionary director ----"? What does that mean? That the director has either vision, foresight, or both. One would hope so. Great films used to be made by competent directors who kept their vision to themselves, and concentrated on telling their actors how to act, and the photographer what to shoot. I'd welcome a return to that sort of work ethic; and it would surely save money too.

BUT, having said that there's a few directors I follow closely (and probably watch all the future films of, sooner or later) because I've been very impressed with their output the last few years, and because they've managed to be independent and fend off interference from their financiers: Alfonso Cuarón, Martin Scorsese, Alexander Payne, Darren Aronofsky, maybe Brad Bird.
oliver9184 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360