Some of you might find this an interesting read. It's an analysis of a position by Daniel Pipes and his opposition to Sharia law in Ontario (essentially family law arbitration courts). It examines the double standard in Pipes' arguments and compares/contrasts between Sharia (Islamic law) and Halakha (Jewish law), the latter of which doesn't seem to get much discussion.
It should provide some relevant context for this thread in a wide capacity.
Daniel Pipes Brings Weak Sauce: Sharia, Halakha, and Double Standards; Part 1 | loonwatch.com
Daniel Pipes Brings Weak Sauce: Sharia, Halakha, and Double Standards; Part 2 | loonwatch.com
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön
Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
|