|
ok, so now that i've put a check on my anger, for the most part, I'd like to reiterate my question and see if the discussion can continue.
Would the 'living constitution' theorists like to chime in about this proposed law and what it might mean for re-interpreting the constitution in ideological terms?
and derwood, I realize you have a complete phobia and hatred for guns, but that doesn't mean that bringing them up is a threadshit, k?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|