|
ace you obviously don't know what you're talking about nor have you read the materials posted in this thread about bp's information control teams, their work with local law enforcement and the coast guard to manage the leak of important information, which they've been working with greater success than they've managed with the oil that this leaking information is about. from there i think it's safe to conclude that you don't have the first idea of what you're talking about.
the results you focus on above would make it impossible for anyone to do anything about this oil. but to understand that you'd have to understand something of the regulatory set up and what we now know about bp's history with that regulatory set-up. again there's quite alot of information accumulated in this thread which you've obviously had no contact with. so again, i think it's safe to assume that you don't know what you're talking about.
the business on the exploration agreement and booklet about what a leasing arrangement is build on jazz's point concerning the basic agreement that we are talking about here. based on this whole exchange, i think it's safe to conclude that on this register you're more or less in the same position as on the other two.
the question of "swagger" seems to me so locked into some fog that it's hard to know where to start with it. but it's even harder to know where the interest of that fog or the b-school banalities that apparently lay hidden within it.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|