View Single Post
Old 06-07-2010, 04:47 PM   #150 (permalink)
The_Dunedan
Junkie
 
Quote:
it's too bad. Genuinegirly: I feel sad, that your thread has been ruined.
I agree, it is too bad. However, the whole point of this thread was for people to say stupid sexist things, to set up stereotypes of women which could then be busted. Strange Famous has proven to be provided with a bottomless bucket of sexist stupidity, and has obligingly set up any number of stereotypes to be busted. In this way, if no other, he has served the thread's purpose.

Quote:
I have lived 32 years of my life, and I have never been threatened with violence with by a woman or hit by a woman, I have never known a woman (above the age of about 12 when children are all the same) who has acted in a seriously violent way. I have not had any mates who have been hit by women or threatened with violence by a woman as far as I am aware.
This, again, is -your- experience. Yours. Not anyone elses, and not extrapolable to anyone else's situation. Everyone's experiences are different. Edited to add: Similarity is useful, yes, and culture shapes experience in certain similar ways, but each person's experience is unique and of itself. However, the fact that -your- experience seems to fly in the face of everyone else's in this thread should be a clue regarding the following...

Quote:
When I talk about "real life" this is what I mean, and this is what 99% of the people on TFP also experience.
Yet ANOTHER concrete claim (99% of TFP) without ANYTHING to back it up. Why am I not surprised. Additionally, you make a claim that the vaaaast majority of TFP agree with you, despite the fact that so far nobody in this thread has. Despite the further fact that nobody, on -any- thread you've contributed to in regards to women, has -ever- agreed with your sexist, offensive crap. You cannot claim that the majority of a population support you when the visible -totality- of that population oppose you. To do so is to divorce reality.

Quote:
For those who are obsessed with find some right wing anti woman website on google that talks a loaf of nonesense
Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over? Are you serious? I linked to the BBC, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post. Respected newspapers in two countries. Did you even read the links?

Quote:
I place the experience of real life above what someone sitting at home on their own can find on google.
Bullshit. Utter, rank, stinking, putrid bullshit swimming in dead ticks.

If this was -actually- the case, you wouldn't have spent an entire thread telling a US Army Dog Handler that you knew more about dangerous dogs than he did: this despite the fact that he handled large dogs professionally for years and you admitted to having almost no experience even wrestling with one.
If this was -actually- the case, you wouldn't have spent an entire thread telling people who make their living with firearms (and therefore shoot them a LOT) that you knew more than they did despite admitting never having even held a firearm in your life. You wouldn't have spent another thread telling combat veterans that their small-caliber rifles, which they complain of being incapable of reliably -stopping- a 175lb human, were perfect for self-defense against 2,000lb GRIZZLEY BEARS.

If experiences of real life were -actually- what you gave weight to, you'd have started listening to the people -WITH THE EXPERIENCES- a long time ago. You know, the people who actually -use- and -do- the things you so love to bloviate about. OTOH, you've admitted to not being arsed to even -use- Google. So: you won't listen to people with the experiences you claim to value, and you won't use the research tools at your disposal. Since you refuse to utilize the two most common sources of information, people must therefore assume that you are utilizing the third.

Edited To Add: And finally, Strange, if experiences are what you value, why don't we ask the ladies, the women of this thread, what -they- think of your opinions? We're men, us, after all: shouldn't we be seeking -their- input on this question? And specifically, do -they- think women are incapable of the things you've mentioned?

Ladies, if there are any of you left...?

Edited To FURTHER Add: I now discover that, upon reflecting back, the ladies gave their opinions some time ago. I, among others, appear to have missed this. My apologies. If they wish to add anything to this line of discussion, I obviously have no objection. I, however, will say nothing further.

On the OP:

I've yet to meet a woman who could write her name in the snow. I did know one, however, who managed her initials.

Last edited by The_Dunedan; 06-07-2010 at 05:31 PM..
The_Dunedan is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360