Quote:
|
There are photo's in the same thread you speak of portraying a woman with a plastic bag over her head, a noose around her neck, and blood running down her body... and I repeat, you choose to make comments about the innocuous picture I posted?? I think you need to take a look at yourself.
|
No, I do not have the same objections. Because those pics were not posted by a person whose postings suggest that they objectify women, catagorise women, and denigrate women, as yours consistently do.
Quote:
|
I also do not use the kind of racial slurs you are throwing about.
|
I never said you did. I was making the point that your thought process is similar, if not identical, to that of the person who insists that they are not a racist yet constantly says racist things. You insist that you are not a sexist, yet constantly say/post incredibly sexist things, things which I (even as a man) find personally offensive and counter to my experience of women (and reality).
Quote:
|
almost every statement I make is supported and backed up by the commonly accepted view of society,
|
You mean like "gay men get hard for sexy women?" I've yet to see/hear of -any- society in which this is a commonly-held view.
Quote:
|
by widely accepted facts,
|
You mean like "gay men get hard for sexy women?" Again, I've yet to see or hear of -anyplace- where this is a "widely accepted fact."
Oh this I have -GOT- to hear. How is any of this, any of your positions, "the common good?"
Quote:
|
Time and time I back up what I say...
|
Bullshit. You've yet to do so in this thread or any other: your singular exception being that you once found a pair of magazine/newspaper articles to support your contention that it is physically possible for a human being to beat a Pittbull to death. In no other case that I'm aware of have you backed up -any- of your insane positions. Not only that, but you refuse to consider the backup that other people provide for -their- contentions (citations, experts, demonstrations, statistics, etc), even thought -their- backup comes with sources and annotation and your "backup" consists of insisting and insisting and insisting that you're right and everyone knows it.
Quote:
|
simply because I do not have the time to spend finding some article on google that says the same thing as me doesnt change the facts or reality.
|
But since you are suggesting things which fly in the face of what EVERYONE ELSE experiences as "facts" and "reality," to say nothing of what science has to say about it, and you do so with a proclivity and profundity that is simply horrid to contemplate, other people would very much like to know where you're getting your information/ideas. Under such circumstances, if you wish for your positions to be taken at all seriously, you should provide those sources.