View Single Post
Old 06-06-2010, 11:47 AM   #72 (permalink)
Hektore
Junkie
 
Hektore's Avatar
 
Location: Greater Harrisburg Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Famous View Post
Without being overly crude, what do you think it means?

If his body didnt consent, he would not have a hard on. If he physically did not want sex, he would be unable to have it.
The idea that the uncontrollable physiological response of obtaining an erection could demonstrate the conscious act of consenting is laughable. There are plenty of ways to induce an erection in a man against his will, the simplest of which is likely asphyxiation. A man who cannot properly be considered to consent to anything, such as someone unconscious, is also perfectly capable of obtaining and maintaining and erection.
__________________
The advantage law is the best law in rugby, because it lets you ignore all the others for the good of the game.
Hektore is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62