Boudica was a freedom fighter, not a warlord.
Joan of Arc was a general, and was probably pyschologically male (I believe she dressed as a man for example)
Maggie Thatcher and Golde Meir did not make war on their own, they were leaders of countries involved in conflicts. And in the case of the English attack on the Argentinian Maldives island, this was hardly a major conflict, more like gunboat dimplomacy from a fading empire unwilling to accept its diminishing world power.
I havent heard of the others
As for Countess Bathory - it is widely held that the accusation of bathing in blood etc are nonesence that the crimes she was alleged of committing were cooked up. There is no real evidence that she was anything more than a victim.
Ilsa Koch - as I said, yes there were examples of females guards. But a female society would not have created the the concentration camp.
The American female soldier (named England?) who was involved in the pictures of torture of Iraqi prisoners is probably the most widely known and blamed person in the whole sorry incident. Yes, she was guilty of course. But more guilty than the commanding officers that allowed or encouraged the abuse? I think not.
_
Society accepts the cases of transvestites and transsexuals who are born as male but feel themselves to be emotionally female. It can go the other way, and some women are doubtles born as emotionally male. These are the kind of women (rare as it is) who are involved in cases like this.
__________________
"Do not tell lies, and do not do what you hate,
for all things are plain in the sight of Heaven. For nothing
hidden will not become manifest, and nothing covered will remain
without being uncovered."
The Gospel of Thomas
|