idyllic...all i'll say is that i am wary about sourcing and try not to make uninformed choices in terms of what i choose to post as informational bits. david horowitz is a problematic source. robert spenser is a problematic source. self-evidentially false statements about well-known political figures are problems. they just are. they play into the rhetorical game you're running in this thread. and you're aware that you're doing it, so there's no need to rehearse its outlines.
the idf infotainment about "aggressive passengers" has been effectively discarded by the israeli military itself.
you can scroll through this if you like:
Israel releases Gaza flotilla activists ? as it happened | World news | guardian.co.uk
there was more here, but i think i'll leave it at this for the moment as others have posted in the meantime.
and to answer the question above:
israel exists.
palestine should rule itself.
post-67, the central obstacles to peace start with the israeli settlements which are a motor for israeli colonialism. that's why self-rule for palestine is such a problem.
there's more of course.