Quote:
Originally Posted by genuinegirly
The OP asks about my opinion on the matter. So I share it.
|
Awesome.
I'm going to start using this as part of my signature if one more person posts it as a preface to something that is already obviously their opinion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by genuinegirly
Not exactly.
A woman's body can only survive so many pregnancies. I'm just guessing here, but I'd say 30 would be the extreme maximum.
How does that compare with a man?
|
"So many pregnancies," huh? Okay, so how many is enough? Two? Four? Did you say THIRTY? A Platoon for God's Army? And why do I keep seeing middle class people with minivans sporting 5 dorky cartoon stick figures on their rear window? This debate seems silly given how many women treat their vagina like a clown car (but still in the single digits). Quantity is not an issue. How many of us at TFP have brothers and sisters? Reproduction in "the usual numbers" of the nuclear family still seems quite common, although it is declining among whitey for the reasons discussed in previous posts.
Thanks to the miracle of modern science, a man can reproduce well into his zombie years... assuming anyone will have sex with him.
...
Back to the OP:
The only issue I'd have with being a donor is the legal/financial/emotional issues surrounding it. I wouldn't want the liability. None of it. Take your
Yobaby and git. I wouldn't want the mother suddenly deciding that I need to play daddy either financially or emotionally. Assuming I did The White Thing and had the battery of tests and family history with 10 digit grid accuracy, I'd see no reason to not "lend a hand." Better my swagger than the next guy, right? I doubt I'll have kids in my lifetime, though; dogs are more rewarding.
...
Somebody explain to me how a screened, anonymous sperm donor isn't equally "disgusting" as letting a screened male associate knock you up.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it cheaper to "get it from the tap?"