|
You know what? I don't even know why I'm having this discussion. You've been presented with multiple evidences of your error. You've been told, by a person who specializes in the area upon which you're pontificating, of your error, in some detail. You've been asked multiple times why, if your suggestions and appreciation of such situations is accurate, professionals in the field don't adopt it: you have been unable to answer. We have a professional here for you to consult, in fact, on this question: before you do, however, I'd review his earlier contribution (including video). You've also been asked if you have any experience living or working with large dogs; another question you've declined to answer. You've been presented with every opportunity to replace your ignorance with knowledge, and have simply refused to do so. If I found out I was wrong about some point of shooting, and had the chance to consult Rob Leatham or a Marine Scout Sniper or an SAS paratrooper in order to receive expert correction, I'd bloody well take it. You, on the other hand, in dealing with something that can be just as dangerous as a firearm, have not only refused but have been hostile to the expertise of someone who is highly trained in its' use. If you can't be bothered to listen to people who make their livings working with the thing you insist upon going on about, you deserve whatever happens when you try this crap for real. I just hope to God that your ridiculous ideas don't get someone else killed.
|