View Single Post
Old 05-19-2010, 10:40 AM   #44 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
candle: i have no problem at all with questioning method. when i initially responded to your post, i noted that it was a drag that the whole thing has not yet been released...before i did that i spent quite a bit of time trawling about to see if it had been released elsewhere (like via the mcarthur) but saw nada. i did get to check out the authors of the report a bit and would suggest that you do the same. in the absence of the whole thing this is about as good as one can get in terms of markers that the methodology is likely to be legit. not necessarily perfect, but legit.

your main point is to the side of objections about method, however---it's more about sociological approaches in general and the objection comes down to: it's difficult to account for particularities in an aggregating or statistically based approach. to which one can only say...well sure. but that's not an objection against any particular social-scientific approach because it can apply to any of them. the anecdotal gets left out. that doesnt invalidate anything. it's merely a state of affairs.

structural problems, like the explanations for the stagnation of african-american wealth under 30 years of conservative economic domination, are simply the weight of history and actions shaped by that weight. the lack of access to credit and to opportunities to own and operate businesses that had been visited upon african americans out of "custom" continue to impact on the distribution of wealth. these are not magical or "extra-cultural" matters. they are institutional effects that have to be confronted in order to be reversed. nothing about conservative-dominated social policy or thinking about social policy gets anyone anywhere near doing that. and the evidence in this brief simply points out that there are consequences which follow from that, and that these consequences are kinda ugly. and big. hard to ignore. you know.


the basis for the critique
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360