Quote:
Originally Posted by aberkok
True. But when it's used to justify what we ought to continue to do, it's illogical. I'm just explaining that what is "natural" and what we have evolved to be capable of doing are never solid arguments for what should be.
|
I've never understood how amateur and professional philosophers can choose to ignore our understanding of physical and mental sciences. The theories have science can't be the sole reasoning for what 'ought' to be, but they can provide useful information of what 'oughta's' are best for a mental and physical well-being. I don't think philosophies of men should undermine our health.