|
Tilted Cat Head
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natural manhood
I don't believe you Cynthetiq. You've been less than impartial and its clear cut.
Most of the sources, I've laid here, I've laid before. You and others repeatedly ignored it. I've done nothing new. I've just reposted them with some more quotes. I'd not given links earlier, because your site prohibits giving of links. however I'd specified that the sources are available online. It seems you apply rules arbitrarily.
Yet, its been me all along who has come up with 'facts' and peer-reviewed sources.
Can you name one person here who has refuted my claims with 'peer-reviewed journals or any sources at all -- or has refuted my assertions in any credible way,' except telling me in different ways that I'm wrong and the West is right?
Are you saying that no one can challenge the West and its brand of knowledge? Is peer-review a fool-proof process that means they cannot be wrong? Should they never be allowed to be challenged? What if there are two peer-reviewed approaches, diagonally opposite to each other? One which is popular and the other which is marginalised, but may be superior than the first?
If there is indeed a conspiracy, and the more I'm ganged up against in the way I am on western forums, the more convinced I am, of a western conspiracy against men, of the anti-men forces being extremely strong in the west.
I'll keep coming with more and more sources. As well as personal experiences.
|
No, your reading comprehension totally sucks. First you didn't read what Snowy posted about animals not being gay, if you did, you'd not have made the "mistake" you claim. I can post some information and say that someone else said it, doesn't mean that it's true, nor does it mean that it exists as fact from someone else, which is why the request was to post where you found the information.
The ability to post links isn't arbitrary. Again, your lack of reading comprehension seems to fail you, as we don't allow people to post links to advertise their own websites, on the internet known as spamming. If you bothered to look outside of this thread, you'd have seen there are whole discussions which include links, in fact if you noticed Snowy wasn't chastised for her link to the NYTimes.
What I sense here is your own desire to validate that you may like to rub up against men and possibly have sexual relations with men, but just don't like the fact that someone can put a label upon you. Just because you don't give something a name doesn't mean that it doesn't exist, and just because you give something a name doesn't mean it is exactly boxed in or defined by that defintion.
The point of peer review isn't limited to just 2 opinions. It means that others can study, review,and potentially come to the same conclusion. It seems in your world view, there is only binary. Again, I go back to your reading comprehension because if you read the thread and everyone's opinions you'll find that while they may disagree with you not everyone disagrees with you for the same reasons.
As for Western conspiracy? Well, if you look in the shadows long enough, eventually you'll find some sort of darkness to be afraid of.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|