Quote:
Originally Posted by snowy
It's clear that you didn't read the article, because if you had, you would have noticed that the author and scientists alike agree that it's unfair to anthropomorphize animal sexuality by saying that animals are gay, but that yes, animals DO engage in same-sex relations.
|
It's not what they say -- its what people here in general deeply believe in. The perverted hetero-homo divide is deeply ingrained in the Western psyche .
Western scientists and experts have time and again warned against this divide, against the concept of 'homosexuality' as a separate phenomena that occurs only in those who call themselves 'gays.'
But the point is, you and everyone here goes on to ignore this important point they make, and take what suits the western mindset. So, e.g. the so-called 'gays' will take the information that animals are having sex between males, but ignore the point about animals "not being gay."
You yourself used the word 'gay' animals.
Not that the scientists that realise its wrong to call animals 'gay' practise this themselves. On one hand they warn against the practise, and at the same breath, they go on to talk about 'gay' sex or 'gay' behaviour amongst animals.