Quote:
|
You have any right to ask me for further sources when you consider the sources I've already provided.
|
Where? Just point me to the post in this thread, if I've missed it.
Quote:
|
And there are quite a few.
|
And they are...?
Quote:
|
I've also provided word to word quotes from some of them.
|
Where?
Quote:
|
Also, Snowy, I'm quite familiarized with the history of western male sexuality.
|
Your statements indicate that you are full of it.
Quote:
|
Anyone who understands the core of men's sexuality
|
Which your statements indicate you do not...
Quote:
|
I can tell which historians are on track and who are forwarding the western lies.
|
Who are these historians who are "on track?" And what are these "western lies?" Please be specific and provide citations. Please also prove that what you insist are lies are, in fact, object dishonesty and not simply differences of opinion.
Quote:
|
And I can shred them to pieces.
|
Then why have you stubbornly refused to do so? Start a fight, lose the fight, declare victory and go home: very George W. Bush of you.
Quote:
|
I have enough published sources to go by too.
|
And they are.....?
I can go 'round insisting I'm an Emperor all day, and that some moistened bint -did- lob a scimitar at me. But unless I prove that I am, in fact, an Emperor, and show people the scimitar in question and the moistened bint who lobbed it, they'll put me away!
[/Python]
Edited To Add: I have reviewed the thread and found precisely -two- sources which you provided: one of which was irrelevant and to the degree that it referenced your points at all -opposed- them, and the other of which simply opposed your points. Congratulations. You are now the first person I've ever seen who insisted upon using someone saying he was wrong to prove he was right, all the while insisting that the person was actually agreeing with him. But since your definition of "straight" somehow includes a longing for gay sex, I can see how this could have developed.