Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
wait.... you're saying that western words of sexual distinction are oppressive, yet you live in a culture where an oppressive caste system has been in place for thousands of years?
|
except that we recognize that its an oppressive system and are working against it. You glorify your oppressive system, and refuse to even acknowledge that it is oppressive.
Also, there are thousands of oppressive systems operating all over the world, including the middle eastern religions, communism and so on ... yet, they are all identifiable and people are fighting them. None of them seek to disguise themselves as 'biological truths' about humans. Unlike your society and its sexual mores (esp. the concept of sexual orientation).
---------- Post added at 10:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:12 PM ----------
As for Dunedan and Snowy. I can only go on repeating myself.
You have any right to ask me for further sources when you consider the sources I've already provided. And there are quite a few. I've also provided word to word quotes from some of them.
Also, Snowy, I'm quite familiarized with the history of western male sexuality. Anyone who understands the core of men's sexuality can discern cultural influences of sexuality from the core. I can tell which historians are on track and who are forwarding the western lies. And I can shred them to pieces. I have enough published sources to go by too.
And Dunedil, your degrees only show what the western education has taught you. If it cannot hold its ground in a down to earth discussion like this, where I'm challenging the western view itself, then your degrees are worthless, as far as understanding the true history of male gender and sexuality is concered.
And anyone who claims that 'sex with women' has never been linked with 'manhood' doesn't know shit about history, degree or no degree.
With degrees, you only get the right to distort history and misrepresent it.