Thread: What is "art"?
View Single Post
Old 05-13-2010, 06:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
Baraka_Guru
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by mixedmedia View Post
I am of the belief that art is not owned by people or made by people.

[...]

Granted, my views conflict with those of many people who 'create' art and believe that it is something that belongs to them - an expression of their talents - 'yay me!'
Well, you get this current of philosophy that strives to remove the artist from the formula (consider Barthes' "The Death of the Author"). I see the value in that. And when you remove the artist from the work, you essentially get to that environment where the art has no "ownership."

I think art must be interpreted by the consumer, not the creator. With regard to text, this goes along with the idea of writerly text (again, Barthes), where it's the reader who creates meaning from what is read, as opposed to readerly text, where the reader is a passive consumer who is spoon fed by the author.

Art only comes alive when the consumer can generate meaning from it; otherwise, it's just "stuff."
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73