Quote:
Originally Posted by timalkin
I'm not sure that I understand this question. Arizona is having a serious problem with illegals. The vast majority of the illegals in Arizona are Hispanic. There's nothing unfair about this law simply because most of the people affected by it will be Hispanic. If mostly blond haired, blue eyed Germans were coming across the Mexican border illegally, then blond haired, blue eyed Germans would mostly be affected by the law. The race of the illegals is not the focus of the law.
If an area of New York was having serious problems with gang activities, and most of the gangs were composed of blacks, would it be unfair to make a law to curb gang activity simply because mostly blacks would be affected? Of course not...unless you believe that the race card is acceptable to use in any situation where minorities are affected by anything.
|
Ah, so it's not that you deny that this law will lead to racial profiling, but that you actually think racial profiling is a good thing. I am really not surprised.
A law requiring ID of everyone would be more efficient. But then some whites would find their civil rights violated. In this case, the "race card" is being used by those who will not be affected by this law because of their race.