View Single Post
Old 04-12-2010, 06:19 AM   #24 (permalink)
Cimarron29414
Still Free
 
Cimarron29414's Avatar
 
Location: comfortably perched at the top of the bell curve!
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy View Post
this libertarian stuff gets old fast. no matter the issue, it's always the same silly binary between "the individual" and "society" or "government" or "the collective" as if john locke was not writing speculative fiction in the second treatise on government and was instead offering a coherent view of the origins of the social as a voluntary association of "individuals" who otherwise have no relations one to the other except mysteriously enough they are able to communicate and that means they use that collective dimensioning (*gasp*!) of experience that is language.
which must be in libertarianville like it was for william s burroughs, a virus from outer space.

enough. this loopy ayn rand stuff lets you say nothing---at all---about the actual topic of this thread, which concerns yet another bit of information that's surfaced concerning the extent of the bush administration's flaunting of law under the cover of the "war on terror"

which is not a matter of any general opposition between "the individual" and anything else, but rather a matter of a particular (conservative) administration undertaking a particular (conservative) view of foreign and domestic policy based on a particularly expansive (conservative) view of executive power which was enabled by that favorite of fascist and neo-fascist regimes (conservative) the world round, the state of emergency packaged for your pleasure as "the war on terror."

and it's about consequences for these political choices, whether there are or should be or will be any for the people inside that administration who were responsible for these choices.

which means its about the question of whether the american political system can self-correct as the edifice it's a part of continues its sliding away from being an imperial power thanks in large part to the consequences of the bush administration's (conservative) actions.

but i can sure see the appeal of trying to divert the thread into yet another rehashing of some ayn rand binary.

you can of course always start your own ayn rand threads in which important ayn rand-y topics are debated by people who can find it within themselves for whatever reason to take them seriously.
The only thing that gets older faster is the intellibabble of tenured academia!
__________________
Gives a man a halo, does mead.

"Here lies The_Jazz: Killed by an ambitious, sparkly, pink butterfly."
Cimarron29414 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360