View Single Post
Old 04-09-2010, 07:11 AM   #1 (permalink)
roachboy
 
roachboy's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: essex ma
the bush admin knowingly held innocent people in gitmo...what should happen?

George W. Bush 'knew Guantánamo prisoners were innocent' - Times Online

this is curious: there's a way in which nothing in this article surprises me, but at the same time it's a confirmation of some of my more cynical assumptions about the bush people and the process of manufacturing their "war on terror" figleaf to cover colonial occupation of iraq brought to you courtesy of the project for a new american century.

that this has not as yet been picked up by the american press is at once outrageous and not at all surprising, given the nature of the american "Free" press and it's aversion to excessively critical information unless that information comes from the right. there is something deeply deeply wrong with the information context in the united states and as a function of that something deeply deeply wrong with the functioning of the entire political apparatus.

it seems to me clear that there needs to be something on the order of the chilcot inquiry--perhaps even a variation with teeth that would result in actual prosecutions--and it seems to me that such an inquiry would be supported by people across the political spectrum in the interest of maintaining something of the legitimacy of the american system as a whole. because i think the bush administration damaged something quite fundamental about the american arrangement. and i think pretending it's not there, which seems to be the present administration's plan, is not enough.

what do you make of the article?
the claim that at the highest level of the bush administration it was known that innocent people were being held at guantanomo bay from the start. they were held there in the interest of continuity in the fabrication (and i use this word in all its senses) of the "war on terror."
how is this not criminal?
how is launching a war on false pretenses not a criminal action? (i still can't get my head around this one...)

what do you think should happen more broadly?
do you support a kind of inquiry or other legal action into the bush administration's iraq debacle?

personally i think such an action would benefit the united states immeasurably and would go some distance in reversing the international-scale damage the bush people left behind (we can talk about the collapse of empire if you like)...

but what do you think?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear

it make you sick.

-kamau brathwaite
roachboy is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360