An interesting argument I saw advanced in the massive storm of commentary about this video (one I don't particularly agree with) is that this is a side-effect of the way that 'insurgents' are choosing to fight. If they were acting as armed members of a standing army with the appropriate decorations under the Geneva convention, and the van had something like a cross painted on it to indicate it was not a military target, less civilians might die in 'collateral damage'.
Like I said I don't particularly agree with it (seems a bit like rape apologism - she was dressed provactively!) but I do see the general idea as being valid. They're not at fault, but certainly it contributes, as do all of the other factors..
__________________
"I'm typing on a computer of science, which is being sent by science wires to a little science server where you can access it. I'm not typing on a computer of philosophy or religion or whatever other thing you think can be used to understand the universe because they're a poor substitute in the role of understanding the universe which exists independent from ourselves." - Willravel
|