|
Gave up pot brownies when I returned to the States, don't want an iPhone 'cause I hate touch-screens, got plenty of organic T-shirts (with and without ironic slogans; one's even from Smith & Wesson!), and plenty of beer. Be happy to share with y'all iff'n ye ask nice. Think I've even got a couple of "Bash This!" shirts left over from the one Pink Pistols event I attended.
Seriously, I identify myself much more strongly as a liberal than a conservative in many regards. I'm pro-legalization, pro-immigration, pro-Civil Rights, even (here's a real shocker) pro-Union in many cases. My problem with American "liberalism" is the same as my problem with American "conservatism," and most "isms" in general: it/they demand that one subsume one's own interests and rights to the interests of others, and reserve for themselves the "right" to compel such subsumation with force. I reject the use of force except in concrete cases of self-defense or defense of others from violent assault. I therefore reject the "right" of any person, or group of persons, to use force in order to compel obedience. Violence in defense of life and liberty is one thing, violence to advance a goal or promulgate a doctrine or engineer a society is entirely different and wholly abhorrent, IMO. It's the difference between defending yourself from a drunk, and walking up to somebody and starting a fight. One will get you laid, the other will get you arrested, and with good reason.
|