|
And the pro-AGW groups aren't funded by groups with their own agenda? Sorry, but this sounds to me like another attempt to paint anything that questions humans as the source of global warming. The "climate sceptic" label is certainly couched in a negative light, as if it were somehow unacceptable.
As for 'spreading inaccurate and misleading information', need we say anything more than the University of East Anglia/Hadley Climate Research Unit?
The odds of getting an unbiased, objective discussion of the issues are getting a LOT longer these days. From both sides.
__________________
The secret to great marksmanship is deciding what the target was AFTER you've shot.
|