View Single Post
Old 03-27-2010, 07:57 AM   #3781 (permalink)
oliver9184
Psycho
 
Little Caesar 7/10 is, along with The Public Enemy (9/10) and Scarface (7/10), one of the three films that kick-started the gangster genre soon after sound first came to the movies. Here urbane, sophisticated and generaly non-gangster Edward G Robinson plays Rico Bandello, the callous lowlife loosely based upon Al Capone with "a chip on his shoulder the size of Chicago". He's not as watchable as Cagney, more so than Muni but more classic Hollywood gangste than either. His voice was surely the inspiration for Chief Wiggum.

Chronos 6/10 is a "non-verbal/non-narrative" time-lapse photography film made by Koyaanisqatsi photographer Ron Fricke. It, and its music, pales by comparison to that film but there are some effective moments. It was made for Imax and it's score would be higher had I seen it there instead of on my little oldfashioned TV.

Carnal Knowledge 7/10 is a sex-drama/comedy from 1971. Except for in The Shining, which sort of doesn't count, I haven't ever seen Jack Nicholson loose it so brilliantly as here. I know that everyone already knows it but he is amazing. At one point Art Garfunkel tells him "you can't make fucking your life's work." Forty years later I think Jack would beg to differ. And he precedes his iconic "Here's Johnny!" line from The Shining, saying "Here's Bobbie!" instead, but delivering it in exactly the same way.

Teeth 7/10 is a film I had heard of and been drawn to for some time but was too scared to watch. It's about a girl who has two sets of teeth: one in her mouth and one between her legs. She's in high school and starts off as an advocate of sexual abstinence, then starts hanging out with a boy she likes and gets a little curious about her body. The vagina dentata is as ancient and primal and universal a fear as the incubus/succubus legends and my fear was that this film would explicitly render the horror in a completely sober and "realistic" way - that may have made a better film but it's not something I could have easily watched. But I heard by accident that Teeth plays for laughs most of the time and is pretty much just a throwaway teen horror/comedy. It turned out to be true: there are plenty of laughs, the horror is absurd and/or funny and the film's tone is light.

Taken 5/10 is a silly, brainless thriller starring Liam Neeson as a loving father who has to find his daughter, who has been kidnapped by some dangerous Europeans. Luckily Neeson's career in the CIA (or whatever) prepared him for just such an eventuality as this, and he comes to Paris to kick Albanian criminal ass and rescue his little girl. Empire said it more effectively than I can: "If you took Commando and replaced all its humour (intentional or otherwise) with snarling hatred, you’d end up with Taken - a risible male-re-empowerment fantasy set in a world where a fatal headshot and rescue from a life of inter-racial rape is the best way to win back your daughter’s heart."

Perrier's Bounty 9/10. If you liked In Bruges, and it seems like most people did, you'll like this film which I hadn't heard of before I entered the cinema. It's laugh out loud funny, fast-moving and really poignant. With its amused and detatched narration it's like an Irish Big Lebowski. Cillian Murphy, who I've not seen lead a film before, is a revelation, totally believable and much more likeable than Colin Farrell's manchild in In Bruges, and the rest of the cast - including Jim Broadbent and Brendan Gleason - is excellent. There are large holes and larger coincidences in the story but they don't matter because the film skates over them so fast.

Layer Cake 7/10 is a British crime film from 2004 starring Daniel Craig and Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon). It's a slickly made and easy to watch film that suffers by way of a disinteresting and unsympathetic lead character (Craig) and an ending which is so egregious and hollow it feels like the film just slapped you and said "fuck you for watching this".

Bug 8/10 is a very interesting horror film from 2006 starring Ashley Judd and Michael Shannon. For a long, long time you sit watching, wondering where the fuck it's going. It takes ages to set itself up but it all pays off and it's refreshing to see that in a film that's not thirty years old. Not a surprise when you consider it's adapted from a play and the director's none other than William Friedkin. The two leads are impeccable in demanding roles and give tremendous performances.
oliver9184 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360