Quote:
Originally Posted by Cimarron29414
Silent Jay,
You framed the entire OP as if there was some sort of equivalency to their "transgressions". As I did not know who Galloway was, I assumed you acted in good faith and that this was basically a free speech double-standard. I immediately requested that you provide speech of his to compare. However, you did not act in good faith - you left off a critical piece of information. Galloway provided material support to Hamas - an organization listed in Canada as a terrorist organization.
|
Ummm you asked for a speech yes, and I showed you why he was banned in the post after that, but hey this thread is dead so why are you posting here? I never left it out, I figured the Canadians knew why he was banned, and looking at Baraka's post he did, sorry if you didn't, a simple Google search would have told you why. But nowhere did I say what they did was equal, merely one was banned and the other wasn't banned.
Quote:
|
So, while I did make an assumption that he was banned for his speech, that assumption was based on a belief that you had provided us with all of the information - which you had not. Furthermore, you didn't even provide "speech" of Galloway to compare to Coulter's.
|
There wasn't a speech of Galloways to compare, look at post 4 it shows why he was banned, not my fault you assumed it was for speech, nowhere have I said he was banned for his speech or that he was banned for anything compared to Coulter, you made those assumptions on your own without knowing what was going on.
Quote:
|
You are attempting to do a bait and switch and blame me for saying he was banned for speech. The fact is that it was a disingenuous OP that created that assumption.
|
Blame you, not blaming you for anything, maybe you shouldn't assume things, like I actually care enough to blame you for anything, are all your posts all about you? seems to be a trend, me, me, me, me, and I'm not baiting and switching anything, and calling something a fact, doesn't make it one, my op is what it is, you've already called it a dead thread, yet continue to post, so....
---------- Post added at 09:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:00 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by ottopilot
I believe the phrase was "the POTENTIAL for even more Canadian mob-violence and hate-crimes." Geez... count to ten, breath.... in... out...
|
Oh sorry I missed a word potential Canadian mob violence, nice considering there was no mention of violence in the article, I mean what were they going to be doused with maple syrup and pelted with beavertails. Like we have so much mob violence here, I mean every day its on the news, mob kills old lady with beavertails, mob douses baby in syrup, just such a regular occurance there must have to be more.
As fo counting to ten, really? Thats all you have, so disappointed in the great ottopiliot, he's resorted to things I said as a little kid, wow must be time to give up the smartass comments if thats all you have left.