Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
there is zero requirement, no requirement at all, associated with the exercise of any right, including the ownership of a firearm. please show me other wise if you have it.
|
I'm trying to parse the "unambiguous" language of the amendment, which has already proven to be misleading and unclear (regulated meaning trained to start).
So, if the right is for a WELL REGULATED/TRAINED MILITIA, then you have no problem with rules against the owning of firearms for someone who is NOT WELL REGULATED, correct?