Quote:
Originally Posted by dogzilla
This is a material change alright. You can't expand the pool of people getting access to medical care by this many and not expect there to be some limitation on access to medical staff. It's not like current medical staff has 5-10% free time that they can see these extra people.
|
So we should just ignore those 30+ million because it might strain the system?
And there are numerous incentives in the bill to address it.
Quote:
It's also change in that you can't increase the number of people covered by medical care without increasing total cost. I've yet to see a government program actually reduce the cost of anything.
|
More of the "government program" rhetoric....it is more people covered by PRIVATE insurance...spreading the cost.
Quote:
This is also a material change. You can't increase the cost of medical care by eliminating exclusions for pre-existing conditions and eliminating caps and then just assume that insurance companies are going to make it up out of their profits.
|
That is why there is a mandate along with a vastly larger pool to spread the costs.