Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
i didn't answer because i didn't think your question interesting. i still don't. not only do i think it uninteresting, but it's also a threadjack.
|
You made a broad reaching comment about conservatives and supporting art, there was a response to your charge, presented with a question, and now you a charge of a threadjack?
Quote:
|
if you want to pursue your "provocative question" about nascar, start another thread.
|
In your narrow world, you don't get it and I am sucker for continued engagement. I admit my folly as I have done in the past, my flaw has been both a blessing and a curse in my life - but at least I know what it is.
---------- Post added at 07:26 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:19 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
I think this is less a jobless recovery and more an outsourced recovery. It's not that the jobs aren't there; it's that they're going elsewhere.
|
Again, looking at the reasons for job outsourcing, if the true value of a jobs is X and the price paid is X + Y with Y being an unjustified cost added by government - those employing will go where the cost is X or X + y (smaller y). The answer remains the same, reduce or eliminate Y, to grow employment. The Y is in our control.
Secondarily, if we have a growing population who do not have "white collar" job skills due to a failing education system, employers have no choice but to go where the qualified pool of people is. In the US we are developing to distinct classes, the employable and the unemployable. I argue government is contributing to this divide.