i have to say that i don't understand what the position or positions are that idyllic is arguing here. they seem a little...o what's the word....arbitrary.
help me understand something maybe: on what grounds is it ok for conservative southern baptists, who HAVE to know that their views are to say the least eccentric (literal interpretation of the bible? come on...) to impose those views on the entire school-aged population of the state of texas? is it just a prerogative of power, a kind of fuck you we won thing?
and can you explain to me what possible relation thomas aquinas has to the constitution of the united states?
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|