|
first off, it's fine to criticize or reject the premise of an article, but it's usually good form to indicate that you're doing it rather than post what appears to be a non-sequitor. just a note.
i'm not at all sure what actual information you're basing your positions on there, ace. what it sounds to me informs it is more market metaphysics.
for example: on what basis are you arguing, if you are doing that and not simply asserting, that because measures of unemployment are quirky that therefore there is no problem with unemployment? anything? because it flies in the face of empirical reality and most data that purports to describe that reality. or maybe you can explain away something like what's happening in detroit as being driven by something other than massive, sustained unemployment? for example.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
|