Quote:
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I guess that means you are not a fan of public accommodation laws?
You dont think in some communities, the populace would vote to return to "whites only" establishments?
|
see, this is one of the strawmen i'm talking about. you want to equate discrimination laws or commerce laws with the right of patronizing a business based on personal preferences. it's apples and anal lube comparison.
---------- Post added at 08:00 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:58 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by filtherton
There wasn't any actual logic to what you said. I'm not saying that there isn't any logic to your perspective, just that you failed to present any.
I do find your sudden swerve towards nuance intriguing. Tell me, when is it okay for the government to tell private property owners what they can't do on their own property and when is it not okay?
|
when doing so would violate the rights of others, like not murdering someone on their property, but NOT mandating that someone patronize their business because we made it non smoking for you. It's like making bars alcohol free because people want to go there, but not be around alcohol.