View Single Post
Old 02-24-2010, 09:59 AM   #6 (permalink)
Baraka_Guru
warrior bodhisattva
 
Baraka_Guru's Avatar
 
Super Moderator
Location: East-central Canada
See, this is the thing: the bestseller is dead.

Okay, I just wrote that for effect. The bestseller isn't dead, but the bestseller is no longer as potent and exclusive as it once was. The thing with top selling books is that they were typically manageable in that they could be wrung through a system that worked on a profit model and they could be, in turn, slogged to the masses in a way not unlike you described above, rb, in your reference to herding consumers, telling them what's hot and what's not.

Well, this has changed in that it's entirely possible for small presses and even self-publishers to eek out a living. I've seen it happen. What makes this possible is knowing where to go to find a readership. The model that everyone is accustomed to----the stacks of Dan Browns in warehouse-style bookstores----is now rivaled, if not surpassed, by niche distribution made possible by digitization and the Internet. The collective book sales of titles that are in no way bestsellers now outweighs the collective book sales of bestsellers. The sheer volume of titles, and the sheer volume of readers with wide interests, makes this possible.

So you basically have two models now: the bestseller model and the niche model. With the latter model, you don't herd consumers; instead you try your darned best to go where they go. The power of choice is in their hands, and so you serve these markets; you don't create them. Heck, many of those in these markets are the creators. You get this subset of consumers who are author/publisher/critic/readers or any mixture thereof.

Basically, what legitimizes "information" (I prefer the word "content") is it being chosen for consumption. Period. You can play the numbers game and say that Harry Potter is more important/legitimate than Don DeLillo's Falling Man or Otep Shamaya's Caught Screaming (Lulu.com's current poetry bestseller), but where does that get us?

Our experiences with texts---their creation, distribution, and consumption---are now largely fragmented. I've never read Dan Brown or J. K. Rowling, nor will I ever. Where does that leave me in the culture of books/texts?
__________________
Knowing that death is certain and that the time of death is uncertain, what's the most important thing?
—Bhikkhuni Pema Chödrön

Humankind cannot bear very much reality.
—From "Burnt Norton," Four Quartets (1936), T. S. Eliot
Baraka_Guru is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360