|
skepticism is good.
in any event, this isn't framed as a hypothesis toward experimental proof. These would all be unique cases with insufficient distribution to constitute a statistically significant sample of a population. I see it more as a situation requiring and amenable to detailed research. Some of this can be done on the web. "Dr. Bruno Cortis" would be the initial operand to enable an ongoing review of relevant material.
skepticism is most laudable when followed by intellectual curiosity and thorough research.
__________________
create evolution
|