dksuddeth

that is not what I asked or said.

What I asked was that, with your current position, if Obama, Reid, or Pelosi answer a question with some hemming and hawing, we can automatically assume that their answer is in the negative sense, not that they are not giving the whole answer. And then, when we assume that negativity, we won't have to worry about you being any sort of defender or apologist for the negative answer we assume, you'll just agree with us. do we have that right now?

__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."