View Single Post
Old 02-03-2010, 03:31 PM   #189 (permalink)
rahl
Junkie
 
rahl's Avatar
 
Location: Ohio
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth View Post
remember this phrase.....'power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely'.

Now, Are the USSC justices smart people? I would assume so since almost every USSC justice has been to law school and been a lawyer. One shouldn't assume that they understand their role in govt. Some probably have, while some have probably salivated at the opportunity to make long standing federal policy. Their role should be to interpret the laws as written, compared to the plain text of the constitution, then decide if those written laws violate the plain text of the constitution. When you allow those justices to also interpret the constitution, you end up with tortured variations of the constitution so that you end up with rulings that you end up with 'public use' being defined as 'increasing the tax base of a community', such as we ended up with the Kelo decision. Had those justices NOT 'interpreted' the constitution, but ruled along the plain text, there is no possible way that 'public use' could be interpreted to mean 'stealing private property, handing it over to another private entity for development, and then calling it public use because it increases tax revenue'.

Where 'we the people' messed up was allowing that bullshit to go unpunished. When a decision is handed down, and we the people know damned well that it violates the constitution, we should have pushed for an impeachment of those justices. Why did we not? I would assume that most of us are at least intelligent enough to read the constitution and understand it, right?

for example, we passed the 14th Amendment to insure that all recently freed slaves enjoyed all the rights of US citizenship, correct? yet when us v cruikshank was ruled upon in direct contravention of the 14th Amendment, because those judges were racist, we didn't act and we should have.

Of course, i'm sure that some people will say that impeaching justices for bad rulings sets bad precedent or some such thing. But isn't changing or ignoring the will of the people in effect treason?

power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

we should not let those we put in to positions of power and authority abuse that trust.
To me this seems overly cynical. Obviously ALL people are susceptible to corruption, but that doesn't mean ALL people have been corupted when in positions of power. I understand your position on the literal wording of the document, but the literal wording could not possibly account for all possible situations hundreds of years in the future.
__________________
"Your life is Yours alone...Rise up and live it"
rahl is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360