Quote:
Originally Posted by rahl
|
are you implying that the USSC is always 100% correct?
Quote:
Originally Posted by rahl
Further examples of limitations of your rights are you can't yell fire in a crowded theatre, or bomb on a plane. So again rights aren't absolute.
|
logical fallacies all. I can yell fire in a crowded theater, especially if there is a fire. I can yell bomb on a plane, especially if there is a bomb on the plane. I may be charged with endangering the public if there is no fire or bomb, but I do have the right to do so.
again, rights are absolute, otherwise constitutions mean absolutely nothing.
---------- Post added at 06:04 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:02 PM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
And the last I checked, prison inmates no longer have the right to bear arms.
|
did you miss the part of the conversation where I said that inmates lose certain rights while prisoners through the 5th Amendments due process of law?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
Maybe we aren't on the same page with regard to the meaning of absolute?
|
I'm certain that we are because of ideological perspectives.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru
I don't know, do they still have the right to bear arms? It's a right that shall not be infringed, right? Is it absolute or not?
|
while they are inmates, they have very limited rights. This is because they've had the due process of law to lose liberties.