Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
the constitution is written in plain english. If one chooses to muddle it up with ideas of 5 words equates to paragraphs of interpretation, that is their cross to bear. It's not how the constitution was set up to begin with. The judicial branch was set up to rule whether laws or edicts violate the constitution. It doesn't take interpretation to deal with that, unless one chooses to ignore the precepts of the constitution in support of what they wish it said. All one needs to do is look at each amendment to determine exactly what we the people decided the government could and could not do. You can't get much simpler than that. If a straightforward view and reading of the constitution is something you think is beyond you, then maybe you should do something about that.
---------- Post added at 11:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 AM ----------
when they are wrong, we all should
|
Sorry man but none of our rights are guaranteed or absolute. And the USSC does interprit the constitution, not just follow it's wording to the letter. Hence differing opinions from each of the justices.