Quote:
Originally Posted by rahl
So your interpretation of the constitution should trump the USSC? WOW!
|
the constitution is written in plain english. If one chooses to muddle it up with ideas of 5 words equates to paragraphs of interpretation, that is their cross to bear. It's not how the constitution was set up to begin with. The judicial branch was set up to rule whether laws or edicts violate the constitution. It doesn't take interpretation to deal with that, unless one chooses to ignore the precepts of the constitution in support of what they wish it said. All one needs to do is look at each amendment to determine exactly what we the people decided the government could and could not do. You can't get much simpler than that. If a straightforward view and reading of the constitution is something you think is beyond you, then maybe you should do something about that.
---------- Post added at 11:22 AM ---------- Previous post was at 11:18 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Derwood
it's like dividing by zero. He opposes the judicial body that the constitution established to rule on matters of the constitution
|
when they are wrong, we all should
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|