View Single Post
Old 01-20-2010, 10:10 PM   #16 (permalink)
ASU2003
immoral minority
 
ASU2003's Avatar
 
Location: Back in Ohio
I gave my overview in the 41st senator thread. He has to work on policies that individual groups in the left want. He won't win lots of points with everyone, but he needs to do more. And I'm tired of these polls that don't differentiate the negative from doing things they don't like versus not doing enough things he should be doing.

I think he could have handled a few things better. They started the Healthcare thing two months early or two months late. Copenhagen should have happened in the summer, and he should have set us on a new energy direction. He did get a supreme court justice seated that is good.

There is a lot of anxiety over America in general that is getting blamed on the White House, but they aren't really responsible. What is the person complaining about the national debt going to do in order to fix it without cutting more jobs? Have they stopped buying imported products? It's the 60 year olds that fear inflation in retirement that are really worried. The stock market is doing better, I think a lot of people who are over 50s & 60s were scared when their 401k lost a lot of money, but they should feel better now if they rode out the dip in the market.

It's still early. But we shall see what he says at the State of the Union next week. (More people care about a fictional island on a TV show than the state of our messed up country)

The democrats need to come up with a new plan since people feel like they need to work and are addicted to it. (It is probably easier to be an entrepreneur and do it yourself than find a job, but I know no one who has lost a job in my set of friends & family. I don't blame the government* for the unenployment rate, I blame the people who all of a sudden (smartly) started saving and the raising fees from companies who have a product that is mandated or in high demand)

*You can probably search my posts for the minimum wage ones. I'm surprised no one has suggested the correlation between when min wage increases started was the same time things started downhill. Although it didn't have the intended purpose of limiting CEO pay and excessive compensation at companies that are just middlemen.
ASU2003 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360