Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian
Do you honestly need a citation for the assertion that uncomfortable women have a difficult time orgasming, or that a typical medical examination room is uncomfortable? If you do I'll have to apologize, because I sincerely doubt any researcher would ever waste time on such a thing.
|
There are plastic surgeons all across the US that do something called a clitoral enlargement. The method of this procedure goes something like this: locate the clitoris, stimulate the clitoris until it becomes engorged and emerges from under the hood, and inject the clitoris with testosterone. In order for this procedure to work, the surgeon has to stimulate a woman and evoke a sexual physical response. In a clinic or hospital environment. It's not just an accentual sexual response like what may occasionally happen with pelvic exams, it's a necessary part of the procedure.
If a plastic surgeon can consistently elicit a natural physical sexual response, why can't a (likely better trained) researcher?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martian
You'll note that a few of these articles do note a relationship between the clitoral shaft and/or root and the anterior vaginal wall, but there's only one that indicates anything that could be remotely considered evidence for a discrete 'G-spot' structure. As for that one -- well, I'm certainly not an expert, but I'm not sure that 5 out of 7 is statistically valid.
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa, who said anything about a structure? The "spot" in g-spot suggests location, not structure. If there's a specific location within the vagina (a little bit in, on the roof) which when stimulated triggers the sexual response associated with g-spot stimulation/orgasms, that's the g-spot. I don't know of anyone that's suggesting there's some g-spot organ or something. I certainly wasn't arguing that, in fact above I very specifically said that it was internal clitoral stimulation. That doesn't mean there's no g-spot, though.
My interpretation is "Gee, that spot feels good".