I reread the OP and I'm having a bit of trouble understanding. Science doesn't work by democracy. Asking a woman if she has a G-spot is no more scientific than Fox News asking if President Obama is a secret Muslim. There's no experimentation taking place here, it's just a census.
Quote:
The women in the study, who were all pairs of identical and non-identical twins, were asked whether they had a G-spot.
If one did exist, it would be expected that both identical twins, who have the same genes, would report having one.
|
They, being individuals, could interpret the same stimulation differently regardless of shared phenotype.
Here's how it should work
Is there a G-Spot?
Research, including both testimony and experimentation
Construct a hypothesis
Test the hypothesis directly with experimentation
Analyze the results
Until this is done, there cannot be any scientific conclusion presented.