Quote:
Originally Posted by Halanna
The estimated female population of the world in 2009 was 3,386,509,865.
They call talking to and having surveys filled out by 1804 of those a "large" study?
|
I think that when they say large, the mean that it's large enough to provide statistically significant results.
On a more general note, it would be nice if it didn't cost money to read the actual research paper, because the flimsy BBC writeup says a lot without really saying anything.
It would be interesting to see how the researchers addressed the possibility that some of their participants might have lacked sufficient sexual experience to know whether or not they had a g-spot. Or whether the prevalence of g-spots found among their participants is similar to the prevalence of g-spots in the general population.
I don't think this study disproves the existence of g-spots at all.